Imagine reviewing your own exam before submitting it. You’re likely to overlook errors simply because your brain sees what it expects. The same thing happens in software development: when the same person writes and tests the code, objectivity is compromised.That’s why test independence is a key principle in quality assurance. According to ISTQB, having some level of independence in testing improves defect detection.
Test independence refers to the degree to which someone not involved in the creation of a work product (requirements, code, etc.) performs its testing or verification.📖 ISTQB defines it as:
“A degree of independence makes the tester more effective at finding defects due to different cognitive biases than the author.”
ISTQB outlines multiple levels of independence, from lowest to highest:
📌 Example: A small startup may have the same developer test their own work (level 1), while a bank may hire an external firm for security testing (level 4).
While independence helps, too much of it can create gaps:
👉 That’s why ISTQB recommends a balanced approach, combining various independence levels:
Test independence isn’t a rigid rule — it’s a strategic practice that, when applied wisely, enhances test effectiveness. It helps detect more defects, build trust in quality, and provide a fresh perspective on risks.So ask yourself: is your testing truly independent, or are you checking your own work with blinders on?