23 May
23May

Imagine reviewing your own exam before submitting it. You’re likely to overlook errors simply because your brain sees what it expects. The same thing happens in software development: when the same person writes and tests the code, objectivity is compromised.That’s why test independence is a key principle in quality assurance. According to ISTQB, having some level of independence in testing improves defect detection.


🧩 What is Test Independence?

Test independence refers to the degree to which someone not involved in the creation of a work product (requirements, code, etc.) performs its testing or verification.📖 ISTQB defines it as:

“A degree of independence makes the tester more effective at finding defects due to different cognitive biases than the author.”

🔄 Levels of Independence

ISTQB outlines multiple levels of independence, from lowest to highest:

  1. Testing by the person who wrote the code (no independence)
  2. Testing by a peer on the same team (low independence)
  3. Testing by a different team in the same organization (moderate independence)
  4. Testing by an external team (high independence)

📌 Example: A small startup may have the same developer test their own work (level 1), while a bank may hire an external firm for security testing (level 4).


🎯 Why Is It Important?

  • Reduces cognitive bias: Authors often miss what they assume is correct.
  • Improves defect detection: A new perspective reveals hidden flaws.
  • Ensures user-centered testing: Especially critical for usability and acceptance testing.
  • Boosts objectivity: Keeps development and validation clearly separated.

⚖️ Full Independence vs. Collaboration

While independence helps, too much of it can create gaps:

  • Poor communication between testers and devs
  • "Us vs them" team dynamics
  • Isolated QA teams
  • Testing delays if independence creates bottlenecks

👉 That’s why ISTQB recommends a balanced approach, combining various independence levels:

  • Developers test units
  • Internal QA test integration and systems
  • Customers test acceptance criteria

🛠 How to Apply Test Independence Practically

  • Small teams: Use peer reviews and pair testing.
  • Mid-sized projects: Assign testing to separate QA roles.
  • High-risk projects: Include external testing (e.g., security, audits).
  • Agile teams: Encourage cross-functional collaboration but retain independent validation for key releases.

🧠 Conclusion

Test independence isn’t a rigid rule — it’s a strategic practice that, when applied wisely, enhances test effectiveness. It helps detect more defects, build trust in quality, and provide a fresh perspective on risks.So ask yourself: is your testing truly independent, or are you checking your own work with blinders on?